|
Post by jjm on Jan 30, 2006 16:35:38 GMT
You're in a shoe shop, second in the queue for the till. Behind the shop assistant on the till is a pair of shoes which you have seen and which you must have.
The female shopper in front of you has seen them also and is eyeing them with desire.
Both of you have forgotten your purses.
It would be totally rude to push in front of the first woman if you had no money to pay for the shoes.
The shop assistant remains at the till waiting.
Your friend is trying on another pair of shoes at the back of the shop and sees your dilemma.
She prepares to throw her purse to you.
If she does so, you can catch the purse, then walk round the other shopper and buy the shoes.
At a pinch she could throw the purse ahead of the other shopper and, *whilst it is in flight* you could nip around the other shopper, catch the purse and buy the shoes.
Always remembering that until the purse had *actually been thrown* it would be plain wrong to be forward of the other shopper.
|
|
|
Post by pjaye on Jan 30, 2006 16:44:46 GMT
That is so unbelievably sexist!!!
|
|
euphony
Mezzo forte
Z4, if you please!!!
Posts: 61
|
Post by euphony on Jan 30, 2006 23:03:59 GMT
And so simple, clear and concise it's pure genius!!! I can't wait to tell the wife, the mother in law and every other thick b*tch I can get a hold of tomorrow. I genuinely think you've solved the most difficult problem since Fermat's Theorem. Well done John!.
|
|
|
Post by Sop brotherston on Jan 30, 2006 23:04:03 GMT
Sexist but my sis understands the offside rule now so it works lol
|
|